In 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General described loneliness as a public health epidemic, drawing attention to a concern that cuts across age, profession, and life stage. While loneliness is often associated with older adults, clinical experience increasingly shows that it is just as prevalent among adolescents and young professionals.
Take the case of Gayatri (28), a successful social media influencer. From the outside, her life appeared fulfilling, marked by financial independence and a strong online presence across platforms such as YouTube and Instagram. However, she reported a persistent sense of emotional disconnection. Her relationships felt conditional; she experienced friends as envious and perceived her family’s validation as tied primarily to her online success. Beneath the curated digital identity, she struggled with a fear that her absence would go unnoticed if not for her social media presence. Despite a structured routine centered around content creation and brand collaborations, she felt a lack of genuine, emotionally available relationships.
This narrative is not uncommon among young adults transitioning from college into ambitious career paths. The pursuit of success, often defined by visibility, achievement, and external validation, can gradually overshadow the importance of nurturing meaningful interpersonal bonds. In the process of “hustling,” emotional connections may be unintentionally deprioritized, leading to a subtle yet significant sense of isolation.
Loneliness, however, is not confined to early adulthood. Adolescents, too, are reporting similar experiences. Tanisha (16), for instance, described a lack of deep connections despite studying in the same school since early childhood. She observed that her peers engaged minimally in face-to-face interaction, even during school hours, while remaining highly active on platforms like Instagram and WhatsApp. This shift reflects a broader cultural transition, where digital communication increasingly replaces in-person engagement.
These patterns align with the concerns raised by Jonathan Haidt in The Anxious Generation. Haidt describes a shift from a “play-based” to a “phone-based” childhood, arguing that excessive reliance on smartphones and social media has fundamentally altered how young people develop socially and emotionally. Real-world interactions characterized by spontaneity, shared experiences, and nuanced communication are being replaced by curated, asynchronous digital exchanges. Over time, this can impact attention span, emotional regulation, and the depth of social connection.
A different manifestation of loneliness emerges later in life. Suresh (55), a highly accomplished legal professional nearing retirement, began experiencing a growing sense of emptiness. While his career had been successful, he acknowledged that he had consistently deprioritized friendships, often attributing this to time constraints and lack of inclination. As retirement approached, he became increasingly aware of the absence of meaningful social connections and reported anxiety about the void that might follow the end of his professional life.
Suresh also found it difficult to initiate or rekindle relationships. He described reaching out to old friends as “awkward” and “desperate,” noting in therapy, “My ego wouldn’t allow me to.” His self-concept, strongly rooted in intellectual identity, contributed to a tendency to dismiss casual social interactions as trivial. Therapeutic work focused on identifying these cognitive and emotional defences, helping him gradually lower his guard and reframe his beliefs. Over time, he began to recognize that even seemingly insignificant conversations can serve as the foundation for deeper, more meaningful relationships.
Similarly, Shakshi (65) experienced loneliness following her children’s relocation abroad. With limited day-to-day interaction with family, she initially reported a sense of emotional emptiness. Her early understanding of connection was closely tied to emotionally intense conversations centered around personal struggles. Through therapy, she began to expand this definition, recognizing that connection can also emerge through shared presence and activity.
By engaging in group-based activities such as dance, music, chess, bridge, and mahjong, Shakshi gradually built new social networks. This shift allowed her to experience companionship in a more organic and less emotionally demanding way. Over time, she reported feeling more autonomous, less dependent on specific individuals, and more secure within herself. She developed a reassuring internal belief that solitude does not necessarily equate to loneliness or abandonment.
These cases illustrate an important psychological insight: “loneliness is not merely the absence of people, but the absence of meaningful connection”. It is shaped by how individuals perceive relationships, the expectations they hold, and the emotional barriers they maintain. As stated by Mother Teresa “loneliness and the feeling of being unwanted is the most terrible poverty”.
Addressing loneliness, therefore, requires more than increasing social contact. It involves examining underlying beliefs, developing comfort with vulnerability, and engaging in relationships with authenticity and openness. Across the lifespan, the capacity for connection remains present, but it often requires conscious effort, psychological flexibility, and a willingness to begin, even in small ways. I truly subscribe to the words of sociologist Brene Brown that “connection is why we’re here; it is what gives purpose and meaning to our lives”.




0 Comments